Stop cyber abuse and remove the evidence of it

Removal plus evidence, in the right order

Abuse cases have a sequencing trap: delete everything instantly and you may destroy the evidence needed if law enforcement or courts become necessary. We preserve forensically first — archived copies, metadata, account identifiers — then file takedowns aggressively across every platform involved. Harassment, threats and doxxing violate policy everywhere; the work is volume, persistence and escalation, which is exactly what victims shouldn't have to do themselves while under attack.

Who ends up needing this

Harassment campaigns rarely pick targets at random. The cases that reach us cluster into patterns: professionals attacked by a former partner or disgruntled ex-employee, small business owners targeted after a public dispute, streamers and creators who attracted the wrong community's attention, and people caught in a viral moment who never asked for an audience. What these cases share is asymmetry — one person absorbing content produced by many accounts across many platforms, often around the clock.

That asymmetry is why doing it yourself fails. Reporting one post takes minutes; a campaign produces dozens a day, across platforms with different forms, different policies and different evidence requirements. The attackers are organised. The response has to be too.

The levers that actually move harassment content

Every major platform prohibits targeted harassment, credible threats, doxxing and coordinated abuse — but each defines those terms differently, and a report that quotes the wrong policy gets auto-rejected. The strongest filings map each piece of content to the specific rule it breaks: a post exposing your home address goes through the doxxing channel with proof of residence, a threat goes through the safety channel with context establishing it as credible, an impersonation account goes through identity verification. Where a platform's front-line moderation says no, escalation paths exist — trusted-flagger routes, legal request portals, and pressure on the hosts behind smaller sites that ignore reports entirely.

Doxxing gets filed first, always. Exposed addresses and phone numbers convert online abuse into physical risk, and both platforms and search engines treat them with appropriate urgency when the filing is made correctly.

What resolution looks like, honestly

Most harassment content on major platforms comes down within days of a well-made filing; sprawling campaigns across forums and fringe sites take weeks of sequenced work. "Done" means the abusive URLs are removed or de-indexed, your name search no longer surfaces the attack, the evidence file is preserved and organised in case you later pursue the attacker, and you have stopped checking your phone with dread.

Some adversaries stop when their content stops landing. A minority persist, creating new accounts as old ones fall. For those cases, ongoing detection with same-day filing — the core of our Protection Plans — turns a recurring crisis into routine maintenance handled by someone who already knows your case.

One more thing worth saying plainly: you don't owe anyone a thick skin. Clients sometimes apologise for being affected by "just words on the internet." Sustained harassment is an attack on your sleep, your work and your family's sense of safety, and outsourcing the fight against it is not weakness — it's the same judgment that has you hire professionals for every other adversarial problem.